![]() In the end, the case did not go to court. Instead they chose to play in the mud, and bring us down there with them.” “They could have taken the high road, worked with us to make the school a safer place. “They had a choice here,” Alex Prout said of the school. Think what that does to a child and her ability to trust a system that is supposed to protect her.”īut instead of being intimidated by Delaney’s motion to name her, Chessy Prout decided to go public, to out herself, even though doing so meant her name would forever be associated with the worst thing that happened to her. “This was a threat, and Chessy took that threat to heart. “This wasn’t a legal tactic,” Alex Prout said of the motion to name his daughter. Paul’s exists for the good of children for a school to use this tactic on one of its own was inexcusable. Plenty of institutions sued by sexual abuse survivors leverage the persistent stigma that comes with being assaulted as a way to protect themselves. “It takes a callous attitude for a defendant to ask a victim’s identity be revealed,” attorney Mitchell Garabedian, who has represented many abuse victims, told the Globe at the time. ![]() The motion was roundly criticized by advocates for assault victims as a transparent attempt to intimidate the Prouts, and one that would discourage other survivors from coming forward. At the trial, he said, she should be named. On behalf of the school, he argued that Prout should remain anonymous before trial only if her advocates refrained from speaking publicly about the case.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |